The neatest part is the card they put together for you. I cracked up at mine and my special +0 power. Also surprised by my karma performance this year. I had not realized I had gained so much!
So to recap:
 |
| Go me! |
 |
| And I was entertained! |
 |
| tuck frump and puck futin |
I was thinking about skins in games and wanted to talk about one of the things that annoys me.
 |
| TF2 Silhouettes |
Fast forward to the modern age and the explosion of skins as a key revenue stream for online games and the one thing that annoys me about skins: skins obfuscate a characters role in the game. For example I will use my current game of choice, New World, and how it uses skins.
Skins are available and can then be applied to any equipment slot for a player. The problem is skins are not visually tied to armor weights so a heavy armor user can apply a skin that looks like light armor and vice versa a light armor user can dress up in heavy plate armor skins. Most annoying is shield skins where players can use the skin for a small round shield while using a big ole' tower shield.
This means I lose out visually on clues about my opponent. A character running around with a small round shield should be indicative of a light armor load. If I jump in to attack them thinking that and end up hitting a wall because the player is actually a heavy armor tank with a tower shield (more damage reduction) it is a "feel bad" moment. And I will admit I've used to this my benefit by being that heavy tank with a round shield skin baiting in attackers thinking I was a light weight.
Even though I've benefited from this skins situation it still annoys me. Skins in games should not change the visual distinction needed for the game to give good feedback to the user. In New World's case it is as simple as making skins require specific armor weight to apply (i.e. can't apply a round shield skin to a tower shield, can't apply a light armor skin to a heavy armor piece).
So I plead with game developers: please don't sacrifice visual feedback to players during game play in the favor of giving more skins to players. Please make skins as minimally impacting on playing the game as possible.
Thank you for listening to my rant. Agree? Disagree? Leave some comments.
New World Update 1.8 has arrived and with it some cool stuff! Full release notes here.
First up is a return of the Winter Convergence festival. Last year's festival was a resounding success; gleamite meteors shocking the MMORPG world and showing how open world content can surprise and delight players! The meteors are back (along with the videos with "whoa this is cool" reactions).
New this year with the festival is an open world boss; the Winter Warrior. Similar to the Halloween event boss the Winter Warrior will appear in the open world and require a zerg of players to take down. Initial reports are the fight is fun and has healers running for their lives.
The most newsworthy part of the update is the shell company mitigation which will restrict how players can hop companies and how war rosters have to come together. This should hopefully help reduce single companies, who were creating multiple shell companies, from dominating the map. End goal is to get more players into war because more companies can participate. This is a watch and see change, but on paper it makes sense to have the intended effect.
I didn't get a chance to try the patch out yesterday, but will be jumping in today. Are you out hunting meteor showers? If so leave a comment!
And oooohhh pretty!
Props to the New World development team for sitting down and taking some questions from the community in the most recent Forged in Aeternum. They didn't shy away from the burning questions! And they fleshed out more of what is coming next for the game. First watch the video and then read on for my commentary.
First I do really want to commend the team for sitting down and answering some of these questions; even taking a doozie up front at face value (i.e. reading it off as it was written). The first questions of course were "what about PvPppppp!" and the lack of PvP focus on the road map which of course must mean the development team is all part time and something something. Again, kudos for the team taking this on and discussing staffing of the teams (more developers than they had last year) and stating the obvious "we will deliver more than just the main items noted on the road map".
The team also talked about a few PvP topics and specifically they are working on the territory influence process getting revamped. Outpost Rush (OPR) was also discussed and the team shot down the idea of more maps coming to OPR. The team doesn't want to divide the community between OPR maps, but the team does want to improve the current map so are looking to do just that with the cross-server OPR update that is on the road map.
I think this is the right approach for OPR and a new map would divide the players even further than they are today. It is basically the same issue as having too many mutation levels for expeditions. Fewer is better and in the case of OPR, as it requires 40 players, one is enough. It is still my favorite game mode and I am no where near tired of the map. The one thing I'd want is to fix the wide open spaces to give players more of a chance to navigate the map without getting musket sniped. Annnnnd that is my input on the community question that was posed (see screenshot)... basically keep OPR the great game mode it is with some improvements for traveling around.
Also not on the roadmap but covered in the video was that expedition mutations will be
"squashed" from 10 levels into fewer. They want to combine this with a grouping of changes for expeditions and mutations.
Basically this was a polite "please be patient, we are doing a lot of good stuff" message in a community Q&A. Ultimately the proof is in the pudding and aside from one minor item, Leaderboards, the team delivered above and beyond on the first year's roadmap. Anyone looking at the past year of the game and saying the team is not delivering is just being ignorant. Keep up the great work AGS!
The Ashes of Creation update for December is out and featured a look at the day/night cycle in the game and some group combat focused on the supporting cleric class. Watch the update below and read on for my thoughts.
The first thing I want to say is: combat didn't look great. Janky movement, attacks that seem to take player characters all over the place, and way-over-the-top sound (he did mess with his sound settings in the video so not sure if that was part of it or not). Effects do not fit the visual style of the rest of the world or what enemies are doing. I had more hope after the combat update but many this was a step back from that point.
The second thing I want to say is: everything not combat looked amazing. The world. The constellation system. The transition from day to night. Everything else is so damn amazing. It is so crazy to me how combat is where it is at but the rest of the game is where it is at.
Specific to what was shown off about the cleric it was a bit hard to follow as I think UI elements were missing to help understand the concept of "convictions". From the discussion it sounds like you build up convictions and that improves
There was also discussion of synergy between party members with a stagger mechanic that unlocked another player to be able to stun the targets. I replayed it a few times and not sure I could tell what stagger looked like or how you'd know they were staggered. Hopefully they improve this aspect as combat systems with poor feedback to the player, or overly expect a player to know a bunch of nuances, never work.
Another concern I had was that the group had to take a dedicated break to rest to regain mana. It sounds like with different set ups and higher levels there is regen but the fact there is resting needed is a bit worrying. In today's game market most games are moving as far away from downtime as possible. I like that the team talked about items like campfires that could improve the rest experience.
One really cool thing was how sometimes enemies pop up out of the ground. There really was a sense of an ambush at one point. This was very similar to the combat update where the rock monsters popped out of the environment.
The only worry I have with the spawn system is they may be overusing the "pop out of the ground" spawning system. I know Steven has said he wants to avoid the "enemies just standing around" model but if its just "enemies always pop out of the ground" model then is anything really different other than increased player frustration of not being able to trust the world around you? For the record the only two spawn types we've seen in updates is pop out of the ground and standing around.
One other thing I want to comment around combat is that I felt there was a lack of weight to the feeling of combat. When the party was fighting larger enemies I did not get a sense that the enemy was, in this case, a large rock enemy. It sort of stopped whenever a player was reached. I expected more chaos similar to the cave troll scene from Lord of the Rings movies, but got more of a Steven Seagal karate demonstration.
There were some UI elements; mainly health bars and a skills bar. They looked clean and hit the MMO standard, so not much to say about them.
Something I also caught during the video was the player mount staying around after dismounting. I really like the idea of mounts persisting after dismount. I hope this is something they are keeping.
Steven talked about diminishing returns regarding status conditions (slow, root, silence, etc). Glad to hear this as its an area that games miss on. No player likes to repeatedly lose agency (i.e. control) and diminishing returns are a great way to ensure someone doesn't end up in the dreaded stunlock. This is something New World has struggled with for example. Again, good to know its being tackled out of the gate.
Steven asked for feedback on if players wanted night to be complete darkness or whether they should reserve true dark for specific areas (like a cave encounter). I have fond memories of true dark nights before I knew about screen brightness, but in the modern gaming era it is too easy to cheat real dark out of it's effect. Thus my feedback is: no true dark, anywhere.
Also Steven asked about luminosity during open world gameplay. My feedback here is that the clearer it is the better. I dislike dreary area after dreary area. Let all areas be mostly clear during the daytime hours and minimize how often we have to deal with dreariness. Basically let me have Hobbiton as much as possible!
And I'll leave you with this last comment: boob armor.
Did you catch the boob armor? Either way go ahead and leave a comment.
I had a great match this morning in Battlefield 2042 playing Irish stopping explosives and getting assists. I may average just below 1:1 kill vs death, but I can support the team like a champ. It is awesome that 2042 rewards support and reserves a billboard spot at the end of the match for the top assists.
 |
| My first "Most Assists" award! |
 |
| Look at all those explosives destroyed.. 83! |
Game mode was Breakthrough on the Spearhead map.
The next big item was the confirmation the class reintroduction will occur in update 3.2.
Update 3.2 will be a big one for us with the reintroduction of Classes to Battlefield 2042. All our existing Specialists will be placed within defined roles with a set of gadgets and equipment that best suit their purpose on the battlefield.
This is a massive change for the game and will bring it back to the model of all Battlefield games of the past. While I wasn't playing prior to Season 3 my understanding is the original Specialist system was too far removed from what is expected of a Battlefield game and contributed to a lot of the "WTF" reviews of the original version. Since launch its been a steady crawl back to the tried and true concept of Assault > Medic > Engineer > Recon. I look forward to see what this shapes into.
Also mentioned are new maps and map reworks. I have mostly played Spearhead in my short stint so can't comment on the reworks. Community sentiment seems to be that the team is focused on the right maps to rework and there is excitement around possible new maps.
One area that was not mentioned was Battlefield Portal. I would have thought there would be a call out for whats next with Portal. It seems like a cool concept and my few forays into I've found fun little game modes to give a try. I wonder if its not a key feature at this point? Not sure.
If you are interested in giving Battlefield 2042 a try the game is free to play until Dec 5th.
Have some thoughts about this First Look at 2023? Share a comment.
The New World December Dev update video is out and with it comes Roadmap 2.0. You won't believe whats in it! Read on (or watch the embedded video) to find out and I'll also share some of my thoughts.
First, apologies for the click-bait lead in but it was purposeful. The first thing to note about the Roadmap 2.0 what was shared in the update is it is pretty much what was expected. Nothing surprising or exciting. It was a confirmation of "we are going to do what we said we were going to do". Let's take a look at the Roadmap 2.0 as thats where I want to focus my thoughts.
Unlike the first roadmap that covered an entire year this roadmap is only half a year. I am good with that as it will give us something to look forward to later in the year. Also doesn't commit the team to things that may or may not be relevant in a few months time.
The first item on the roadmap that I want to shout "HELL YES!" about is the Spring 2023 "Gear Set Storage System". This is the number one item on my list of features for this game. I would do more content more often if it was easier to change out my gear. While I have previously stated I was fine with "using a spreadsheet" that has worn on me; it still takes 10+ minutes to make the changes to other gear sets to swap to different content. Thus I just stick in my PvP gear for the build-of-the-moment and then shrug my shoulders at the thought of not doing PvP content. Yet I have half a dozen PvE sets ready to go for any sort of PvE content.
Spring 2023 also includes a new expedition. I know this pissed of some PvP players to see another PvE expedition and no PvP-specific content, but I like it. I really enjoy New World's expeditions. The more the better. I would have liked to see "and we will have cross server expeditions" as part of this road map but understand that is going to take time (note: they have said they are working towards it). I play on a high population legacy server so getting groups is not really a problem.
MSQ Improvements is also on the Spring 2023 portion of the road map. Not excited about this at all. I get why they are doing it since they revamped the level 1-25 portion, but as I wasn't too impressed by the new experience so I really don't think it merits more work. Yet, for new players coming to the game it makes complete sense so I'll just say "OK" to it.
In the Summer 2023 category of "HELL YES!" is the transmog system. Having played Guild Wars 2 - aka Fashion Wars 2 - I look forward to besting enemies on the field of battle dressed as a chef. Also there sounds like there will be a collection aspect to this so you can "check the box" on all the transmog skins you have collected. I like making sure boxes are checked.
Also in Summer 2023 are raid groups and the first "raid" (aka elite trial as they are calling it). We will finally get to go beyond 5-player groups and also get to take on the giant sandworm that tremors around Brimstone Sands. The worm will supposedly be the "hardest PvE content" they've delivered requiring maxed out gear and solid coordination. That will probably limit how much I get into it because that's not really my thing in MMORPGs; I am the guy that likes to squash regular expeditions in my full 625 GS sets. But I was also not a huge "dungeon" player before New World and yet I've found myself from time to time doing a lot of "dungeons" in New World (at least more than I did in games like World of Warcraft).
Then last but not least on the Summer 2023 hype train is Cross World Outpost Rush. HELL YES! HELL FREAKING YES! I love OPR (Outpost Rush) more than any other game mode in New World. Even on populated servers it doesn't always mean there are 40 interested players to get an OPR started. Cross server will solve this and I suspect lay the ground work for future cross server content like expeditions. Any PvP player complaining about this road map is not recognizing how key cross server OPR is to getting better PvP game play out of New World. PvP players should be hanging their hats on this roadmap item!
Speaking of PvP players one item NOT on this roadmap is ranked PvP arenas. One would have thought that ranked PvP arenas would be right up there as "next" on the list of things to do but here we are and its not listed. Does it mean it won't happen? No, they could fit it in under the "additional content with each release" disclaimer. Personally I think it speaks to something about arenas: they just aren't where it is at for this game.
The game just doesn't shine in 3v3 arenas in my experience. I play a ton of solo queue arenas but that is mostly because I play in small increments and can't wait out an OPR queue. Once cross server OPR exists I probably won't do 3v3 arenas except to get my gypsum. 3v3 arenas are more often frustrating than rewarding; rare is the competitive match and "competitive" matches I've watched from the good 3v3 teams are long drawn out messes of who gets lucky enough first. I will repeat it: competitive 3v3 arenas are NOT where its at for New World.
To recap the roadmap: we are getting what Amazon Game Studios said we would be getting. Mainly that was more expeditions, gear set management, transmog, and raids (elite trials). This likely pisses off PvP players, but what doesn't piss those players off? For the sometimes PvP and sometimes PvE players that make up the bulk of this game the road map is spot on. Way to go AGS!
What are your thoughts? Share a comment.
I can't imagine playing the game without proximity sensors now and it is a constant flood of experience gained for spotting enemies and getting assists when they get killed. Throw a sensor into a contested control point and watch the assists and "enemy spotted" experience roll in.
I am still playing Irish as my main specialist and with his ability to stop explosives getting tossed/shot in combined with proximity sensors I am consistently closing in on the top of the leaderboard each match and getting the satisfaction of seeing my team perform better. I will admit I suck at the shooting aspect of the game so it warms my heart that I can contribute so effectively playing Irish with proximity sensors. Toss an ammo box to resupply the team and I'm one happy camper.
For context in my all-time favorite Battlefield game, Battlefield 2, I was a medic or engineer most of the time. Either I was healing/reviving players or smacking vehicles with wrenches. Being able to play as this support play style is what always attracted me to Battlefield games over other shooters and it is definitely happening again here with Battlefield 2042!
This also has me jazzed up about other gadgets and specialists I have yet to play with and I can't wait for the next "aha!" moment! I can feel the Battlefield teeth sinking in; so much so I didn't even log into New World to do daily activities... which is the first day in a while I have not logged into New World!
Hate the "wall hack" proximity sensors? Or do you tell players to "get gud"? Leave a comment so my comment sensor beeps.
